Chemical Dependence Outpatient Treatment Plan



ChemicalDependence Outpatient Treatment Plan

ChemicalDependence Outpatient Treatment Plan

Forone to develop a thorough and comprehensive outpatient plan, theindividual should integrate the data procured from the assessmentdomains in the table above with the one from the determinationprocess and the drinking behavior assessment parameters. However, thediagnosis assessment allows the medical team to determine whether theclient meets particular criteria. However, it does not offersufficient information concerning the overall target practiceparameters such as alcohol abuse, psychosocial factors, and othersubstance use. Nevertheless, Longabaugh et al. (1994) observe thatthe role of assessment stretches beyond diagnostically classifying anindividual’s problem to offering an extensive picture of otherfunctioning areas.

Consequently,three intelligence levels are crucial to obtaining a “relapseproneness” sense of an individual (Shiffman 1989). In other words,they are significant in the treatment planning. They fall on acontinuum of their closeness, in both control and time, to thepossibility of relapse. Additionally, the first among them stands forthe general personal characteristics such as personality factors, thelevel of dependence on the behavior of addiction, family addictionhistory, and demographic factors. To some extent closer in influenceand time are “background variables” that an individual is likelyto experience in the course of maintenance and treatment. Theyinclude the level of professional, personal, and other interpersonalstress of individuals who support the abstinence and the positivechanges under implementation.

Anotherproximal degree includes the factors with a close association withrisk circumstances. For example, the category includes imminentself-productiveness or confidence level that an individual will notrelapse while they are in a situation that involves risky factors.Such factors include interpersonal conflict, temptation and urges,depression, and social pressure to drink (Goldman et al. 1987).Similarly, one expects to stick to positive results concerningaddictive behavior and coping ability convenient to mainly handle thetemptation to take part in an addictive behavior (Litman 1986).

Assessmentdomains for treatment planning of an alcoholic outpatient:Descriptive Information.



Clinical Utility

Target Population

Groups Used

Norms avail.

Normed Groups


Provides a structured measure of father and mother alcohol abuse for a lifetime.

It helps in ascertaining the alcohol abuse history by parents

Adolescents and adults

Problem drinkers, non-problem drinkers, alcoholics




To give information about the recent (last 30 days) and employment, and lifetime medical, AOD use, support, social/family and mental issues concerning AOD use.

Assists in the identification of the areas of problems help in the planning of treatment and the result evaluation


Adults looking for treatment for the abuse of substance problems homeless, prisoner populations, pregnant, and psychiatrically ill.


Females and Males opiate, alcohol, gamblers, alcohol, psychiatrically ill, substance users, employee assistance, and probationers.


Measures self-productiveness about alcohol abstinence, defined in terms of the courage not to drink in situations where people are drinking and urge to drink

Determines high-risk circumstances where the individual has low levels of resistance and under high temptation to drink assists in the development of relapse preventive interventions


Alcoholics under treatment and Problems drinkers


Out patient alcohol abusers


Identifies the maladaptive drinker’s problem patterns underlying their alcohol consumption motivation

Identifies the concerns of the client in key areas of life, their relationship with their drinking incentives, and aims for methodical motivational counseling to modify the incentive patterns

Adolescents and adults

Alcohol abusers, work inhibition cases/ burnout, extensive counselees


Alcoholic outpatients, college students, chemically dependent seniors

Works Cited

Goldman,M.S. Brown, S.A. and Christiansen, B.A. Expectancy theory: Thinkingabout drinking. In: Blane, H.T., and Leonard, K.E., eds.PsychologicalTheories of Drinking and Alcoholism.New York: Guilford Press, 1987. pp. 181–226. Print.

Litman,G.K. Alcoholism survival: The prevention of relapse. In: Miller,W.R., and Heather, N., eds. TreatingAddictive Behaviors: Processes of Change.New York: Plenum Press, 1986. pp. 391–405. Print.

Longabaugh,R. Mattson, M.E. Connors, G.J. and Cooney, N.L. Quality of life asan outcome variable in alcoholism treatment research. JStud Alcohol Suppl12:119–129, 1994. Print.

Shiffman, S.Conceptual issues in the study of relapse. In: Gossop, M., ed.Relapseand Addictive Behaviour.London: Tavistock, 1989. pp. 149–179. Print.