Conclusions of Empirical Research

CONCLUSIONS OF EMPIRICAL RESEARCH 4

Conclusionsof Empirical Research

Author`sName

InstitutionalAffiliations

Empiricalresearch refers to a method of data collection using observation,experience or experiment. The empirical evidence gathered is analyzedqualitatively to arrive at the conclusion. The primary purpose ofempirical research is to prove the pertinent of theories by examiningthe real environment as well as improving understanding (Taylor,2013). Majority of researchers use this approach because it helpsintegrate research and tries to show beyond doubt superstitionknowledge that people rely on. Logically, an argument can be invalideven though the conclusion is the fact-based. On the other hand, anargument can also be valid even with a fallacious conclusion. Mostpeople experience belief bias when they are deceived byjustifications that are false but have convincing conclusions(Taylor, 2013).

Researcherssystematize their research by identifying the purpose of theirresearch and following the research process to arrive at theconclusion. There are numerous elements that help determine whetherthe findings of these empirical researches are logically supported ornot. The first element is the hypothesis (Taylor, 2013). It is thesuggested explanation of the event. A reasonably supported conclusionhas a null hypothesis that researchers try to challenge. This helpsin solving the problem.

Theother important aspect to consider is the research process to adopt.The method chosen should not exceed the limitations of what theresearcher can handle (Taylor, 2013). Constraints that can compromisethe research include time, ethics and finance amongst others. Inaddition, the research method selected can limit the factorsaffecting the phenomenon.

Theempirical measurement is also necessary for giving a logically arguedconclusion. A researcher might use measurements that do notcontemplate the factual world, leading to invalid arguments andconclusion (Taylor, 2013). On the same point, conclusion is based ondifferent factors constituting the research process. It must be validand supported by the appropriate elements. Observation, experienceand logic thinking direct to the cessation. People who have investedinterests in the research should be in a position to check forcorrelation between the empirical evidence and the conclusion given(Taylor, 2013). Sometimes, researchers have successful research studybut fail to support their conclusion adequately.

Reference

Topof Form

Taylor,C. S. (2013). Validityand validation.Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bottomof Form